• Home
  • Contact
  • US Envoy
    • Undocumented Irish
  • Biography
  • Memorial
  • Recent
  • Data Privacy Policy
John Deasy T.D.

PAC 2014

Could recidivism rate be lowered by more funds for prisoner reintegration?

14/3/2014

1 Comment

 
Picture::: Brian Purcell, Secretary General, Dept of Justice
PAC | March 13, 2014
Department of Justice
Secretary General, Mr Brian Purcell, called and examined.

[Extract]
Deputy John Deasy: With the indulgence of the Chairman, I will ask a further question on training, education and development programmes for former prisoners and the reintegration of former prisoners in the community. One such programme, U-Casadh, is located in Waterford. How much money is the Probation Service allocating to these organisations? Does the Department intend to increase funding for these groups? Do these programmes work and would it be worthwhile investing more money in them?

Brian Purcell: 
What is the name of the project in Waterford?

John Deasy: It is called U-Casadh and one of many such programmes aimed at reintegrating former prisoners into the community.

Brian Purcell: There are obviously significant benefits from having schemes that facilitate the reintegration of prisoners into the community. One can only do so much work in terms of rehabilitation within a prison setting. As I know only too well from my time as head of the Prison Service, when offenders are going back into the community, the early stages after their return are the key period. Whatever progress can be made while they are in custody, it is important that supports are available on the outside. The Probation Service has a budget for these projects and in 2012 expenditure on community based organisations was approximately €10.3 million. The Department intends, in so far as our budgets allow us, to continue to support community based projects for offenders returning to the community.

John Deasy: The focus of the committee is on saving money and obtaining value for money. Does investment in rehabilitation programmes for offenders save money in the long run? The Department obviously has conducted cost-benefit analyses in this area and of some individual projects. What is Mr. Purcell's opinion of the investment it is making in rehabilitation projects? Do they pay dividends and would it be worthwhile investing more money in them? Has the Department carried out an analysis?

Brian Purcell: I believe the projects are paying dividends. To be honest, some of them are better than others and the Probation Service examines, audits and analyses the various projects to find out which ones it considers are delivering the greatest benefits. This will continue to be done on an ongoing basis.

"We have all read reports on the success the Scandinavian countries have achieved in this area."
Picture
John Deasy: Does the Probation Service make a case to the Secretary General for additional budgets if it finds they are needed?

Brian Purcell: While the Probation Service would look for extra budgets, obviously the Department's budgets are limited by the amounts allocated to us by the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform. We fund 45 community based organisations that are funded by the Probation Service throughout the country, which represents 28% of the entire Probation Service budget allocation. These organisations provide a range of services, depending on the areas in which they operate. I certainly believe one can obtain a significant benefit from investment in community run and community based programmes for prisoners. One of the measures we have introduced that has been quite successful has been the community return scheme where we have taken suitable prisoners and put them into the community. In other words, the prisoners concerned are able to serve the tail end of their sentences in doing community service. This project has proved to be very successful since it was introduced in late 2011. I see the way forward as continuing to invest as much as possible in those services in which the Probation Service is involved because this investment is showing benefits. For the first time in a long time we have seen a reduction in the number of people coming into custody. The investment we have made in this type of project in the community and through the Probation Service has been instrumental in that regard. I am not saying by any means that it is the only reason, but it is-----

John Deasy: Mr. Purcell has made a significant statement. He has said he believes these schemes are effective and that it is worth investing money in them. I do not know if the Comptroller and Auditor General has ever examined this issue or if his office has a role in analysing the expenditure the Department and the Probation Service allocates to these organisations in terms of its effect and the end result for the Exchequer in reducing the level of reoffending and the recidivism rate among those who enter these programmes compared to that among those who do not do so. Would it be worthwhile examining this issue? Would such an examination be helpful to the Probation Service or the Department?

Seamus McCarthy: We looked at the Probation Service in considerable detail, but, again, it was probably about ten years ago. I think one of the aspects we looked at was how they assessed which programmes worked and perhaps which were less successful. While it is something we could certainly return to at some point, it is not an easy process. One could end up case-making if one wanted to support this approach or one could end up making a case to abolish these organisations if one wanted to do this. There are so many variables in the equation that it is a significant challenge for the Department. However, it is something that needs to be done.

John Deasy: Mr. Purcell has stated these programmes have had a considerable effect on the recidivism rate. Given that a study of the programmes in which we are investing €10.3 million has not been conducted in the past ten years, surely we need to analyse them to ascertain how effective they are? All of these organisations keep track of the people who avail of their programmes and each of them will, therefore, have statistics. We have all read reports on the success the Scandinavian countries have achieved in this area. I do not know if there is anything more scientific that could be done to bolster our belief and faith in investing in this area.

Seamus McCarthy: The point about my office having looked at it about ten years ago is beside the point. The Department would be obliged, in terms of its spending on an ongoing basis, to do that type of evaluative work on a routine basis, not waiting for my office to come and do it.

Brian Purcell: We do that. We have a very close engagement with the Central Statistics Office. We have two members of staff from that office in the Department, one of whom has done a great deal of work with the Probation Service and would focus on the type of thing that works and the type of thing that does not. What I am saying is based on what we have seen ourselves. I would make the point, the Comptroller and Auditor General touched on it, that this is a very broad area and it is not always easy to pinpoint exactly what works and what does not work. In relation to the problem and the individuals one is dealing with, it is not necessarily one particular intervention that delivers the result. It depends on a myriad of different issues, most of which do not fall within the remit of the Department of Justice and Equality, or the Probation Service or the Prison Service. It also depends on a wide range of societal issues but also on a wide range of services provided by a wide range of other agencies.

John Deasy: Sure.

Brian Purcell: We try to evaluate what works best and what does not. That is something we will continue to do although, at the same time, I have to point out that we only have a limited amount of money that we can spend on these projects and we spend whatever we can.

John Deasy: That is what I am getting at. Notwithstanding the intangibles the Comptroller and Auditor General has mentioned - I accept all that and what he has said - I do not know if it is within his remit to take another look at this issue and, perhaps, assist the Department, notwithstanding the work those two individuals do within the Department, to see if this money is being well spent or if more money would result in a lower recidivism rate.

1 Comment
    Picture
    Picture
    "NO PAC FIREBRAND"
    IRISH TIMES ON JOHN

    PAC 2014

    Selected contributions

    Future Hearings
    2013 meetings
    2012 meetings

    Fast finder

    All
    Accidents
    Africa
    Alan Shatter
    Ansbacher Accounts
    Armagh
    Asia
    Atlanta
    Attorney General
    Austin
    Belfast
    Blood Alcohol Limit
    Brasilia
    Brendan Ryan
    Brian Purcell
    Camphire
    Cappoquin
    Carlow
    Central Remedial Clinic
    Charitable Sector
    Charities
    China
    Circuit Court
    Clare McGrath
    Collisions
    Commissioner
    Company Cars
    Comptroller
    Cork
    Court
    Courthouse
    Court Of Appeal
    Courts Service
    CRC
    Crimea
    Department Of Finance
    Department Of Justice
    Director Of Public Prosecutions
    DPP
    Dredging
    Drink Driving
    Drogheda
    Drug Driving
    Dublin
    Dungarvan
    Dunmore East
    Economic
    Enterprise Ireland
    Equestrian
    Ethiopia
    European Court
    Fatalities
    FDI
    Fines
    Fishery Port
    Fishing
    Fixed Charge Notices
    Flooding
    Foreign Affairs
    Foreign Direct Investment
    Fraud
    Garda
    Garda Commissioner
    Garda Síochána
    GoSafe
    Hamilton Goulding
    Harbour
    HEA
    Health
    Heritage
    High Court
    Hong Kong
    Horse Sport Ireland
    Houston
    HSE
    Indonesia
    Industrial Action
    Industrial Disputes
    International
    Intoxicated
    Investment
    Irish Aid
    Irish Embassies
    ISIF
    Italy
    John Deasy
    John McGuinness
    John Treacy
    Josephine Feehily
    Joyce Duffy
    Judicial Appointments
    Justice
    Justice Susan Denham
    Lady Valerie Goulding
    Law
    Legal
    Legislation
    Lesotho
    Letterkenny
    Limerick
    Local Authorities
    Marine
    Martin Callinan
    Maurice McCabe
    McGuinness
    Michael Noonan
    Minister For Finance
    Mount Congreve
    Mozambique
    Mullingar
    Newlands Cross
    NTMA
    Offences
    OPW
    Overseas Aid
    PAC
    Passports
    Pat Healy
    Penalty Points
    Pensions
    Pensions Authority
    Police
    Pope Francis
    PPP
    Prague
    Pretoria
    Prison
    Prisoners
    Private Equity
    Probation
    Protected Disclosures
    Public Accounts Committee
    Public Expenditure & Reform
    Pulse
    Revenue Commissioners
    Richard Bruton
    Road Safety
    Road Traffic Offences
    Robert Watt
    Roman Republic
    RSA
    Sao Paulo
    Scandinavian
    Shane Ross
    Social Protection
    Social Welfare
    South Africa
    Southeast
    Speeding
    Sports Council
    State
    Strategic Investment Fund
    Synthesis Report
    Tanzania
    Tax Amnesty
    Taxes Consolidation Act
    Texas
    Thailand
    The Holy See
    Traffic
    Transport
    Twilight Zone
    U-Casadh
    Uganda
    Unemployment
    University
    Villa Spada
    Waterford
    Waterford Glass
    WExford
    Whistleblower
    Whistleblowers
    WIT
    Yachts

    RSS Feed

JOHN DEASY TD

  • Constituency Office 35, O'Connell Street, Dungarvan, Co Waterford
  • Phone 058-43003​
  • Email john.deasy@oireachtas.ie

Back to Top

  • Home
  • Contact
  • US Envoy
    • Undocumented Irish
  • Biography
  • Memorial
  • Recent
  • Data Privacy Policy